- Home
- Photo Tours
- Live Voyage Reports
- AmaLyra- Christmas Markets
- Honolulu, Hawaii Trip Report
- Hurtigruten Midnatsol – North Cape
- Miami for Families
- Norwegian Breakaway – Christening
- Norwegian Epic – Eastern Caribbean
- Queen Mary 2 – Transatlantic
- Schooner Zodiac – Wine Cruise
- Silver Explorer – British Isles
- Silver Spirit – Athens to Barcelona
- Silver Spirit- Eastbound Transatlantic
- Silver Wind – South Africa
- Tauck Swiss Jewel – Blue Danube
- Viking Freya – Danube Christmas
- Viking Longships Christening 2012
- Viking Longships Christening 2013
- Wind Spirit – Stockholm to Oslo
- Zuiderdam – Alaska Inside Passage
- Hotels
- Airport Guides
- About FTDC
- The Avid Cruiser
Titanic II: Is This Real?

For a ship who’s lifespan in active passenger service encompassed barely four full days, the RMS Titanic has held countless people captive in her spell since she sank in the early morning hours of April 15, 1912. I count myself as a major Titanic buff; her magnificent, one-of-a-kind interiors are still some of the grandest I’ve ever seen, and I rabidly devour any books, films, and articles I can on the subject of the great White Star Line ship.
But plans from a wealthy Australian entrepreneur to rebuild a modern version of this iconic vessel have me left with a rather sinking feeling.
Yes, Australian billionaire Clive Palmer – who’s name seems to be rarely mentioned without the word “eccentric” appended to it – plans to have a Chinese shipyard build a near-replica of the Titanic for a new shipping company dubbed the Blue Star Line. With first, second and steerage classes, Titanic II is scheduled to set sail on her maiden voyage in late 2016.
The only problem is this: every time I hear about this project, I ask the same question: is this for real?
Sure, there are deck plans that have been released (and a glorious PDF version available from The Courier Mail) – except they look generally like Titanic’s blueprints input into a modern-day graphic design program. In many spots, it seems as though the designers aren’t even sure what should go there, like the “Engineer’s Promenade” segment of the Boat Deck, annotated with several bold question marks, or the note promising that Officer’s accommodations aft of the bridge “will be modernised.”
And I, of all people, am open, willing and ready to be dazzled by Palmer’s intent to re-create the Titanic; I just don’t see how it’s commercially viable – or how many people are going to want to cruise aboard a ship where, if built exactly as Palmer intends, would re-create a three-tier class structure where even many First Class staterooms would be considered cramped by today’s standards.
One look at the blocks of space running along the port side of Titanic II labeled “3rd Class Cabins” should be enough to send prospective cruisers – even history buffs like myself – packing.
Here are some facts…er…tentative plans: this new ship will be constructed by CSC Jinling Shipyard, which I would normally hyperlink to had my antivirus software not protested when I paid a visit to their website. Although they’ve constructed other forms of ships before, CSC Jinling has never built a cruise ship to-date.
An article in The Guardian states that Palmer, who made his fortune in real estate and mining, also intends to invite the Chinese Navy to participate in the ship’s maiden voyage from England to New York, a move that seems just a little bizarre.
Moving things further in that general direction, Cruise Critic reported earlier this week that Palmer has stated pensioners would be banned from the ship’s casino, along with anyone else who “cannot afford a first-class ticket.” Which, presumably, means you and I.
Not enough for you? Here’s where I start to chuckle and wonder if perhaps Palmer isn’t privately having a nice, big laugh about all of this: the current plans would feature shared bathrooms for those in “steerage” class and dinner served at long, cafeteria-style tables – just like the original.
No word, though, on what the price range of these “steerage” accommodations – which, interestingly, also won’t be allowed casino access – will go for.
I may not be a billionaire like Mr. Palmer, but I’d be willing to bet that those features are going to be a hard-sell for any corporate PR team, particularly in the highly competitive cruise market that exists today.
I certainly don’t want to rag on the guy’s dream if he genuinely intends to bring Titanic back to life; I just can’t shake the feeling that at some point he’s going to tell us we’ve all been Punk’d.

2 Responses to Titanic II: Is This Real?
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Contact Us
Sign up for the Avid Cruiser newsletter
Article Search
Article Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009








The plans show coal-fired engines and coal bunkers. Current anti-pollution laws would not allow this ship to dock anywhere.
The ship is meant to attract Titanic fans, but would a fan ever purchase a 3rd class ticket and be restricted in the areas he can go on the ship? After the fans have had a voyage on it, would every-day cruisers accept a ship with one-tenth of the amenities, limited entertainment, and that old fashioned pitch and roll of a ship designed for speed, not comfort? Could seniors handle a ship with stairs going everywhere?
I agree with you that Palmer might be “having a go” on us, and I’m betting if it ever sails, it will only be authentic on the external views, and only from a great distance.
If you take a look at the plans you will see the top image is of the orig. for comparison. The design includes modern Diesel Electric propulsion via pod thrusters. The beam is considerably wider and most modern stability measures are not visible. Safety issues have been addressed but are not mentioned in the article. The class system would be unlikely to continue after the first few crossings. The day to day operation of the ship would obviously be by a management staff. I would expect they will have a large influence on how the ship accommodations will finally layout. The plans released are obviously only rough preliminary concept development plans. These are not anywhere near final design. From this design point the real Maritime designers will take over and much of the problems that present themselves at this point will be addressed like the lack of elevators.