I have come down with a terrible cold as I write this. I’m coughing and hacking away, nursing cups of hot tea drowned in honey in a desperate attempt to rid myself of my newfound illness. My condition, however, isn’t helped by the fact I keep seething over the media “coverage” of the incident aboard Carnival Cruise Line’s Carnival Triumph.

Carnival's iconic funnel. Photo © 2011 Aaron Saunders

Carnival’s iconic funnel. Photo © 2011 Aaron Saunders

You’ve probably heard that on Sunday, the 1999-built Carnival Triumph suffered an engine fire off the Yucatan coast which rendered her unable to proceed under her own power. As ships essentially derive their hotel power from the vessel’s diesel engines, this has had an impact on the ability to run necessary hotel operations onboard.

Read: air conditioning, elevators, and in some cases, toilets, are inoperable. Meaning that onboard the ship, the conditions are less than ideal, and certainly not what the brochure promised.

But I’m beginning to think that the one-sided and sensationalistic news coverage I’ve been reading this week has caused my current illness. In that case, I want to stand in line, too, with my hand out, waiting for a freebie from Carnival.

I’m being sarcastic, of course, but consider this: a quick search for “Carnival Triumph” on Google brings up the following:

The last article is quite the headline from a publication that, you’d hope, would offer a more measured take on the incident. Instead, it’s a piece filled with little facts and held together largely by descriptions of the “mass vomiting” (the article’s words, not mine) taking place onboard. The article prior to that seems to suggest that the newlyweds onboard are somehow worse off than everyone else, simply because they’re newly wed.

Even McDonalds is grateful none of its 350 employees onboard as part of an employment incentive program were “injured.”

But perhaps the most revealing article online is this one, where the author muses about why the over three thousand guests couldn’t simply be offloaded – at sea, mind you – to another “empty” cruise ship. While the proposed idea alone should be enough to make even the heartiest lawyer squirm, it demonstrates a basic lack of knowledge that seems to be prevalent throughout: people don’t understand the cruise industry, or how it operates. It’s very different from an airline, where a broken plane can be replaced with another plane. Carnival doesn’t just have “empty ships” lying around, waiting to serve as backup.

Now – I have no doubt that conditions onboard are downright awful. That’s not in doubt. But out of all these articles, I’ve seen a one-sided description of how hard-done-by all these passengers are.

No one’s talked about the crew.

The nearly 1,100 crew onboard the Carnival Triumph are living and working under the same conditions that passengers are. Their accommodations, aside from the senior officers, are located deep within the hull of the ship and far away from the balcony staterooms and suites most guests are accustomed to.

Loungers on the upper decks are perfect for sun-seekers. Photo © 2011 Aaron Saunders

The ship’s upper decks have been a refuge for those with inside staterooms. Photo © 2011 Aaron Saunders

There are engineers and technicians working in machinery spaces that have soaring temperatures on the best of days – let alone without functioning air conditioning.

The bar stewards, stateroom attendants and front-of-house personnel all have to show up for work, in uniform, under these same challenging conditions, ready to be given an earful from the most vocal passengers. I’ve already seen quotes comparing the incident to Titanic (bizarrely inaccurate), Costa Concordia (unfair), and Carnival Splendor, probably the only accurate comparison of the bunch, as she suffered a similar debilitating engine fire in 2010.

Little care also seems to be paid to the lengths to which Carnival is going to in order to gain control of what little it can: they’ve arranged for 100 busses to meet the ship in Mobile, and over 1,500 hotel rooms in nearby New Orleans – enough to house every one of Carnival Triumph’s guests, on the cruise line’s dime.  They’ve mobilized a team of 200 support personnel in Mobile, and chartered flights between there and Houston.

This, in addition to everyone at the line’s Miami headquarters who is operating on little or no sleep.

Carnival's Imagination and Inspiration are part of Carnival's highly-popular Fantasy-class cruise ships. Photo © 2012 Aaron Saunders

Carnival Legend and Elation have met up with Carnival Triumph to transfer meals and supplies. Photo © 2012 Aaron Saunders

But you don’t hear about that. Instead, there are ample descriptions online ranging from the vague to downright gross about feces-covered walls, mass vomiting, no food and free booze.  How accurate those descriptions are is anyone’s best guess.

Few articles I read mentioned that Carnival Legend and Carnival Elation came alongside to provide meals and provisions, while still at sea. Fewer still mentioned that 900 passengers aboard Triumph lacked passports, which would have made disembarkation in Mexico an absolute nightmare.

Today, guests will disembark Carnival Triumph and the world will hear how awful everything was. It’s just too bad no one’s reporting on how well the crew of the ship – the family that lives and works together – handled the situation.

From the Deck Chair will return tomorrow.

 

11 Responses to Carnival Triumph: Making Sense of It All

  1. Nicholas Sabalos, Jr., CDR, U.S. Navy (Ret.) says:

    Well said, Aaron! I couldn’t agree with you more! I, too, am appalled at the absolutely crazy reporting by so-called journalists…..and the narcissistic obsession with the passengers while ignoring a crew of a thousand dedicated professionals obviously toiling in unbelievable working conditions to keep passengers safe and happy during this difficult situation.

    • Aaron Saunders says:

      Thanks Nicholas! Glad you enjoyed it. It’s gotten to the point where I’m afraid to turn on the TV or read the newspaper. I’ve even seen two articles now where they’ve showed photographs of the wrong ship, and several that have linked content to the Costa Concordia. It would be like having coverage of an air disaster and linking everything to PanAm 103 or TWA 800 – not cool.

  2. Nicholas Sabalos, Jr., CDR, U.S. Navy (Ret.) says:

    Get well soon! :)

  3. Jamie says:

    Very well said!! You should send this to various media outlets. I think Carnival is doing the absolute best they can under the circumstances. Their reaccomodation policy and the levels of reimbursement is unprecedented and to me, speaks volumes.

    Keep up the great work!!

  4. Cruiser says:

    I agree much of the reporting seems sensational, but it could also be more aggressive – and may yet become so.

    So far, there has been very little media focus on the repeated engine problems on the very same vessel in the past 30 days, which resulted in late departures, truncated itineraries and late returns. Nevertheless, the ship continued to venture out on additional cruises.

    These previous problems will likely be studied to determine if they were linked to the engine fire.

    I hope the cause(s) can be quickly identified and procedures put in place to prevent future engine fires/failures in other ships.

    The entire cruise industry is suffering from the protracted coverage of this issue and it will likely take some work to rebuild public confidence.

    • Aaron Saunders says:

      Exactly right – the protracted coverage does remarkably little to get down to the real issue at hand: the cause of the fire, and what can be done to prevent it in future.

      Ships like this are built with multiple power generation sources and are designed to be reduntant in the event of an emergency, breakdown, or even fire; that these redundancies failed on both Triumph and Splendor three years ago and resulted in a total loss of propulsion could point to a larger issue. But it’s hard for the public (and even the cruise line) to get down to the facts when so much time is being devoted by media outlets to “one-upping” each other.

      It’s not so dissimilar from the issue Boeing faces right now with its 787 product line and the related battery issues; fear-mongering is making the problem worse.

      • Kurt Wilk says:

        Sorry, Aaron but you are incorrect, these ships do not have redundant power sources, that’s the Navy. These ships have a single Buss which handles the entire electrical system for the ship, the backups are emergency generators powering limited circuits. The same situation exactly on the Carnival Splendor, once the Buss was lost it’s over.The single Buss saves millions in shipbuilding costs,and weight, but obviously it’s vulnerable. The ships propulsion does not necessarily affect the electrical, as the ship can be fully powered without moving. Other issues may point to inadequacy in training and maintenance, but the real problem is cruise lines try to cut costs in the ships officer sections by paying low wages in the engineering sections. Be my guest to compare Cruise Line Salaries to Commercial Shipping. As for the Journalism, we live in an age where Media is geared to Academically challenged pre-teens.

  5. Wansbrough says:

    Its always a shame that negative news is often more appealing to the masses. Well done Aaron for taking a stand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:


Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!